Forums for the Business Analyst

 
  Modern Analyst Forums  Business and Sy...  General  Your opinions on Project Managers
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post 1/10/2009 12:33 AM
User is offline Craig Brown
560 posts
www.betterprojects.net
4th Level Poster




Your opinions on Project Managers 
Modified By Craig Brown  on 1/10/2009 4:34:30 AM)

There are as many types of project manager as there are types of project or business analyst.

I am interested in your experiences with project managers.  What characteristics make for a good one, what are the warning signs that you are dealing with a pm who is going to lead the project astray?

How do you feel project managers and BAs should/do work together?  Does this happen where you work?

Hoping to hear some interesting answers...

Craig

 
New Post 1/11/2009 7:56 AM
User is offline Jarett Hailes
155 posts
6th Level Poster




Re: Your opinions on Project Managers 

 Interesting question!  I don't think I can cover off all my thoughts on this subject, but I'll throw a few out there:

  • A good PM needs your typical leadership qualities - level-headed, calm under pressure, delegates responsibility appropriately, accepts responsibility for failures but shares successes with the team.
  • I like a big-picture PM who can appreciate and understand the details but does not feel the need to ask about every little detail all the time.  Micromanagement will undoubtedly bring down the project and demonstrates that the PM has little trust in the project team, which also leads to failure.
  • Another trait I like to see is a PM who will take the time to ensure that proper planning has occured, even if they're dropped in the middle of a project.  A good PM will argue with sponsors the need to have an effective, documented and accountable plan in place or else the project will invariably set itself up to be manipulated by the forces of stakeholders over time.  Without a proper baseline in place the project has no way of understanding how to respond to requests for change, be they appropriate and natural or otherwise.
  • The best PMs I've had have advocated the BA to be working alongside the PM from almost the project inception to completion.  That does not mean that the BA would become a QA lead for testing (which is one of the biggest misconceptions I still see out there), but rather is responsible for ensuring that the solution is being built to the needs of the stakeholders.  

 

 
New Post 1/16/2009 5:58 PM
User is offline Craig Brown
560 posts
www.betterprojects.net
4th Level Poster




What sort of conflicts do you run into with project managers? 

Thanks Larimar.  I'm a bit surprised at the lack of other replies.

Let me ask another question;

People, What sort of conflicts do you run into with project managers?

 
New Post 1/17/2009 3:17 PM
User is offline Kimbo
456 posts
5th Level Poster


Re: What sort of conflicts do you run into with project managers? 

Hi Craig,

I agree with Larimar's post.

  • Good baseline, with good change management process.
  • Clear understanding and communication of SDLC and the deliverables required.
  • Good communication skills - both ways. Willingness to listen and ask for ideas.
  • Provide clear goals to team members and manage them based on their capabilities. Sometimes micromanaging of a team member may be necessary for a time but generally giving goals and monitoring progress to them.
  • Good stakeholder management. Including protecting team members from politics.
  • I'm personally most comfortable with people with a track record i.e. people I can respect

Not sure I agree that a PM needs to take the sole blame for failure. Probably that isn't what Larimar meant though.

Kimbo

 
New Post 1/18/2009 12:26 AM
User is offline Craig Brown
560 posts
www.betterprojects.net
4th Level Poster




Re: What sort of conflicts do you run into with project managers? 

Maybe Larimar meant that a PM is "accountable' for project delivery (which is often a hilarious concept as he pm isn't in conrol of very much.)

Something I think is not being addessed is the management of constraints.  There are the obvious time/cost dimensions.  But what about quality and product scope?

Thoughts?

 
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
  Modern Analyst Forums  Business and Sy...  General  Your opinions on Project Managers

Community Blog - Latest Posts

As Business Analysts in Agile teams, we often hear about Definition of Ready (DOR) and Definition of Done (DOD). But beyond the buzzwords, these two concepts are powerful tools to drive clarity, consistency, and quality in our work. Definition of Ready ensures a user story is truly ready for development. It answers: Is this story clear, feasible...
In today's fast-paced digital world, successful projects aren't just built on great code—they're built on clarity. And that clarity often comes from one key player: the Business Analyst. At the heart of every great product or system is a need—a business goal, a customer pain point, or a regulatory requirement. But busines...
I have always loved cooking. I learned from my Grandma June and her kitchen was her sanctuary, a small, warm sunlit space filled with jars of spices, stacks of cookbooks, and the comforting smell of something always on the stove or baking in the oven. Grandma June was as great a cook as she was a teacher to me. She never followed a recipe “to...

 






 

Copyright 2006-2025 by Modern Analyst Media LLC