Forums for the Business Analyst

 
  Modern Analyst Forums  Business and Sy...  Requirements  Transitional Requirements - showing process statuses between legacy and future system
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post 2/23/2016 7:23 PM
User is offline transitioned
13 posts
10th Level Poster


Transitional Requirements - showing process statuses between legacy and future system 

Hi All

We re creating a licensing system.  There are 2 main functional groups: licensing and compliance.  In phase 1 we're delivering for Compliance - i.e. they will be the only group using the system.

The high level value chain is:

Application --> Licence --> Licence Conditions --> Inspection --> Enforcement Action

Licensing and Compliance pass information back and forth about licensees.

The question is should we just replicate the old licence statuses in the new system. 

One principle I've used is that Compliance only deal with licenses that are in effect.  So any status where the licence is still an application shouldn't be shown in the new system - because the licence doesn't exist yet.

Another is that some records have statuses that don't exist in the legacy system anymore, therefore those statuses should be mapped NOT replicated.

My issue is more deciding to map or just replicate the statuses that still are valid in the old system and do relate to final licences that have been granted.

But for other statuses should I just replicate the status in the new system?  E.g. in source system we've got a status of 'withdrawn'  currently we're mapping that to 'inactive'.  And there's other statuses that are mapping to inactive - so we're consolidating a list of source statuses to a smaller list of target statuses.

 

 

 
New Post 3/10/2016 8:15 AM
User is offline Chris Adams
323 posts
5th Level Poster






Re: Transitional Requirements - showing process statuses between legacy and future system 

Without understanding a lot more detail about your project and systems it's hard to give a definite answer.

However, I can give you this advice.  If certain statuses make no sense for a user of a particular system, why would you show them at all?  Therefore, it sounds like you would either show a subset of statuses that DO apply, or maybe there is a reason to map certain statuses to another status.


Chris Adams
Core Member – ModernAnalyst.com
LinkedIn Profile
 
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
  Modern Analyst Forums  Business and Sy...  Requirements  Transitional Requirements - showing process statuses between legacy and future system

Community Blog - Latest Posts

I have always loved cooking. I learned from my Grandma June and her kitchen was her sanctuary, a small, warm sunlit space filled with jars of spices, stacks of cookbooks, and the comforting smell of something always on the stove or baking in the oven. Grandma June was as great a cook as she was a teacher to me. She never followed a recipe “to...
Now, I know, I don’t know what kind of new intro BPO may require, but at least I can promise you upfront that I have something different to say about Business Process Outsourcing or simply BPO. What is it? This hasn't been a call center job or a sales job as we all think. It is a mammoth profile, and firms are grappling to ge...
Leveraging Blockchain Technology for Enhanced Data Security in Business Operations
In an age where data breaches and cyberattacks are becoming more frequent and sophisticated, businesses are searching for robust solutions to safeguard their data. Blockchain technology has emerged as a promising tool in this quest, offering a way to secure data with unparalleled reliability. Although initially known for powering cryptocurrencies l...

 






 

Copyright 2006-2025 by Modern Analyst Media LLC