| adrian wrote
I don't believe that the details of modeling an activity diagram have changed significantly in UML 2.0 but then I have not read in full the 2.0 specification.
Here's the official UML 2.0 specification (a bit hard to read): http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.1.2/ -> take a look at the Superstructure
For the official UML info, your main resource is http://www.uml.org; there you'll find links to many UML 2.0 resources including articles, tutorials, tools, etc.
- Adrian
|
Thanks for assisting me, Adrian.
I reviewed the Superstructure document earlier today; it's obviously not something that I can just peruse and expect to comprehend. I just find it hard to accept that there is no simple reference about OR constraints and how they can be applied toward Activity diagrams. I was about to start using forks for what I thought was a perfectly legitimate reason, and then I found one obscure example that used a decision instead of a fork which happens to be, according to you, the correct way to model that scenario. That's pretty frustrating for a beginner! 
Again, thanks for the help.